Choose life.
About Me
My blogger profile
below poverty line student
dream job:
poverty line journalist
all sports


April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005

General Interest Links
Bible Gateway
CIA World Factbook
IMDb - Movies
EVERYTHING about Grammar

News Links
Yahoo! News
Google News
International Herald Tribune
Yahoo! Full Kosovo News
Al Jazeera

Media Specific Links
Poynter Online
Reporters Without Borders
Press Now - SE Europe
Associated Press
B92 - Links
The Australian - Links
UQ School of Journalism

Syndicate this blog
RSS/XML site feed

Add to MyYahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe in Rojo

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Return to Top

Image hosted by

The Earley Edition has officially moved to My dot com, that is. Thanks for joining me.

Sunday, May 08, 2005


Bush is rolling towards Moscow and stirring up the Eastern Europeans along the way. Bush acknowledged the US involvement in the dividing up of Europe after WWII, and how the actions taken with Britain and Russia were not too cool, saying:
"Once again, when powerful governments negotiated, the freedom of small nations was somehow expendable [...] Yet this attempt to sacrifice freedom for the sake of stability left a continent divided and unstable."
I haven't gone searching for any full texts of speeches, but from this I tenuously infer he's acknowledging the freedom of small nations is expendable. I know it sounds like he's saying that was a bad thing of the past and things are okay now, and the invasion of Iraq is a result of that. Sure the country of Iraq would be more 'stable' at the moment had the US not invaded, but they would have been sacrificing the Iraqi population's freedom for that stability. Instead, those Iraqi's are now free! No, we will not sacrifice their freedom for stability. We will sacrifice their stability for our definition of freedom.

I know this is a volatile topic, speculating on the merits of the invasion or whether the people would be better off if still under Saddam. I can't justify leaving Saddam in power based on the huge loss of individual freedom under his rule, but neither can I justify the invasion by saying that individual freedom has been 'restored' because the loss of basic social infrastructure is destroying, I think, more people's lives now. There's no question of what to do, though. Saddam is gone; more people are worse off than before he was gone; those people need serious help to make a comeback.

the earley edition - Posted by Dave @ 5/08/2005 01:04:00 am || || Return to Top