Choose life.
About Me
My blogger profile
occupation:
below poverty line student
dream job:
poverty line journalist
likes:
Kate
photos
all sports

Archives

April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005

General Interest Links
Bible Gateway
CIA World Factbook
Triviachat
Poetry.com
IMDb - Movies
EVERYTHING about Grammar

News Links
BBC
Yahoo! News
Google News
International Herald Tribune
B92-News
Yahoo! Full Kosovo News
crikey.com.au
Al Jazeera
Reuters

Media Specific Links
Poynter Online
Reporters Without Borders
Press Now - SE Europe
Associated Press
Journoz.com
B92 - Links
The Australian - Links
UQ School of Journalism

Syndicate this blog
RSS/XML site feed

Add to MyYahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe in Rojo


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Return to Top

Image hosted by Photobucket.com


The Earley Edition has officially moved to http://earleyedition.com/blog. My dot com, that is. Thanks for joining me.





Thursday, April 21, 2005

The Oppositional Press

A interesting article about what Karl Rove, advisor and campaign manager I think, to President Bush, thinks of the press, based on a talk he gave at a university.
"Reporters now see their role less as discovering facts and fair-mindedly reporting the truth and more as being put on the earth to afflict the comfortable, to be a constant thorn of those in power, whether they are Republican or Democrat," Rove said.
His talk is described in the article as containing four parts:
  1. that there's been an explosion in the number of media outlets;
  2. that these outlets have an insatiable demand for content;
  3. that these changes create enormous competitive pressure; and
  4. that journalists have increasingly adopted an antagonistic attitude toward public officials.
I think it's a fair enough critique. In terms of journalists being antagonistic, I think that stems also from the view that public officials are more often than not being completely untruthful. It's hard not to be antagonistic when you think someone is trying to deliberately mislead you. It is the explosion in the number of media outlets that creates the twofold effect seen in the next critiques: demand for content and competitive pressure. The effect on administration officials being bombarded by demands for information is the selection of specific news they can cater to. You have anything from new semi-professional news organisations, to blogs. A government can't cater to them all if they ask for information at once, so they have to be selective in deciding first which questions to even listen to before secondly deciding which ones to take the time to answer.

It's great that the individual can more and more be their own news organisation through the use of the internet, if they so desire. The potential that has to put excessive pressure on an administration could inhibit them from doing their job, but I won't ever be unhappy to see increasing numbers of people asking the hard questions. Also, I think being a thorn in the side of those in power is important. I'm going to leave it there. I need to go mow a lawn before going to university.

the earley edition - Posted by Dave @ 4/21/2005 08:01:00 am || || Return to Top